Principles and Standards of Veta in Dispute Settlement

Our approach

Ilya Zharskiy Managing Partner

Contemporary disputes are the really complex disputes. There is rarely obtain a radical advantage and defeat an opponent like it is a one-way street. The opponent also works with the best lawyers, and also conducts expertise. The dispute will be difficult and long, there will be great loss of both sides: at least in time and money. Additionally, the result is unpredictable.

Our position: The contemporary corporate conflict requires specialized knowledge - economic, evaluation, financial, analytical, information and technical. Only integration into the judicial dispute or mediation of such expertise consultants can provide the necessary advantage at all stages of the battle.

It is therefore important to understand that the solution of any dispute and conflict is broader than legal procedure. It is not common to talk about, but it is. Lawyers are important but insufficient. And experts are important but insufficient. At least those experts who had practiced until recently.

Who is a specialized expertise consultant in court disputes?

Four standards
are the basis for winning corporate conflict

We have in practice four standards that ensure that experts are involved in the case

1^st Standard

Teamwork

Each project is being worked on by a team of best experts with different competencies who can analyse and conduct a truly in-depth study of issues. No more single experts are only a multidisciplinary team (from financial models to big data). It helps to strengthen the position in complex disputes by fully “closing” related areas of knowledge, as experts synergize each other’s expertise

A mandatory option is the ability to protect their examinations. To do this, we conduct test surveys, simulate court sessions and deal with issues and cross-attacks on our findings. We seek weaknesses and ask ourselves questions before the opponents ask them. And the court has already trained running dogs whose examinations are almost impossible to challenge.

We also do the examinations of opponents: ruthlessly and comprehensively test them on strength. We know where the experts are weak, and we hit it

2^st Standard

Clear documents

The time the judge may give to the report or opinion is limited. To enable the judge and others to read and understand the essence quickly — we write in a clear language, structuring, visualizing the results. This works on the understanding and credibility of the expertise

We use legal design principles, we understand the layout and the intricacies of information visualization

Examples of conclusions

A separate team is working on the formulation of the findings, an editor, visualization specialist and a layer.

3^st Standard

Pre-trial examination

Lawyers and judges do not always believe in the effectiveness of pre-trial examination. This is because the market for judicial examination is filled with questionable companies whose reports are mapped and purchased, causing judges to be treated.

Solving the problem: The expert company should have skin in the game, which means that it should risk important to itself. It must be authority and be responsible for the outcome of its work by participating in the process. Only work that is carried out on the limits of quality and with full responsibility leads to an increase in the value and credibility of pre-trial detention.

Good pre-trial examination is not formally accepted. It is the basis of the correct algorithm for winning disputes:

it is taking the initiative, which is essential for a proactive position;
allows you to avoid court process and negotiate on the shore;
it is possible to avoid the appointment of forensic examination if it has not been done without a court.

The initiation of the pre-trial examination gives a strong position right from the start. To do that, we must understand that specialized knowledge consultants must be attracted as early as possible. And turn to those companies that have put their credibility on the market by doing such research.

4^st Standard

Integration of the expert into conflict at all stages

The expert in our understanding is a full participant in the process and conflict. He enters the pre-trial stage and participates in all stages of further proceedings. Its area of responsibility is specialized knowledge outside the legal plane: economic, financial, construction, analytical, information, technical.

We, together with lawyers, are analysing the strategy and studying the actions of opponents. We find the best ways to strengthen our position and to weaken the position of opponents at each stage.

We are in the trial literally everywhere

So, let's repeat again

The time of single-handed people was gone.

The time when lawyers won the disputes themselves has passed, too.

There are no experts anymore - there are consultants on special judicial knowledge.

Each conflict requires a team of such consultants.

They close all areas outside the legal framework.

They accompany the whole process from the pre-trial stage.

They are as angry, toothy and mature participants as lawyers.

They are understandable and profitable for judges and are extremely dangerous for opponents.

– We are special judicial knowledge consultants. We know that winning a dispute is a matter of technology and knowledge. We have both.

Veta team

Each project is being drawn up by a multi-purpose team of experts of different competencies, who can analyse and conduct a truly in-depth study of issues.

It enhances the position in complex disputes by fully “closing” related areas of knowledge — experts synergistically complement each other’s expertise.

Our approach

Nowadays expert

Special Knowledge Consultant in Judicial Disputes