Construction and technical expertise is the key to the successful outcome of the construction dispute

Construction and Technical Expert Examinations

Construction disputes often occur: the perpetrator is disrupting the deadline, or the contractor does not want to take the job. To resolve the conflict successfully, there is a need to provide convincing evidence of its position.

The Veta Expert Group can determine the volume and quality of the work done, identify the reasons for the delay of construction, verify the object for the conformity of project documentation, calculate the costs of remedying the shortcomings and answer a lot of other questions.

Who is useful for construction and technical expertise

Construction and technical expertise is necessary for an objective understanding of the conflict arising. The examination is therefore relevant for all participants in the building legal relationship: investors, developers, contractors, and other interested parties.

When construction and technical expertise is undertaken

We specialize in integrated management of construction conflicts and understand how important it is to draw consultants on special knowledge to settle construction differences in time.

Notary examination

Construction and technical expertise is useful for fixing the condition of the facility in the main phases of construction:

  • When the contractor changes.
  • When the key stages are completed.
  • In the event of suspension of work for internal and external reasons.
  • In the process of hand over.
Notary examination

How we help at the negotiating table

At the pre-trial stage of the conflict, we will collect the necessary construction and accounting documentation, conduct an inspection of the disputed object, make calculations, and prepare a conclusion. It will help to take a reasonable position in the conflict.

If the case has come to trial

In the course of the court hearing, we will draw up the correct wording for expertise, protect the results of our examination and prepare objections to the opinion of the opponent.

Why Veta

Each expertise is being worked on by a team of our experts with different competencies: construction, economic, technical, financial, analytical. As a result of such synergies, persuasive conclusions are born.

We have accompanied the client throughout the construction conflict and defend our findings in the Russian State Arbitration Courts and international commercial arbitration.

We are based on four standards that ensure results

More about our approach

Сases

Case 1

The Gazprom New Headquarters in Minsk area of 62,489 m2

Description of the Stilobat facility and the pile field of the high-rise administrative building.

The examination was considered in the ICC

The dispute cost

$200,000,000+

The questions posed to the expert:

  1. Define the required period for extension of work for reasons not related to the contractor’s actions.
  2. Determine the change in the cost of materials to contract price.
  3. Determine the amount of actual additional expenditures.
  4. Determine the amount of additional required expenditures for extension dates of work.

Case 2

VTB Arena Park

The examination was considered in the LCIA

Description of the facility Engineering Systems Buildings 1 and 2 and a fragment of the underground part of VTB Arena Park Section 1.

The dispute cost

17,485,725,385 rubles. 77 cops.

The questions posed to the expert:

  1. Determine the difference between the actual cost of work and the cost of the subcontract.
  2. Determine the cost of eliminating defects.
  3. Determine the cost of staff recruitment for completion of the work.
  4. Determine the cost of own staff for completion of the work.
  5. Determine the cost of materials and equipment purchased to carry out defects.
  6. Determine the amount of the unexpended advance.
  7. Determine the amount of return of the unexpended additional advance with interest.
  8. Determine the amount of the fine for late refund of the additional advance and interest.
  9. Determine the amount of penalty for violation of the deadline

Case 3

POLIEF Terephthalic Acid Plant

Production Set consisting of 18 movable and immovable objects, including cable relay.

The examination was considered in the Arbitration Court of Tyumen region

The dispute cost

314, 277, 929 rubles. 43 cops.

The questions posed to the expert:

  1. Determine the cause of the cable crash. Whether the work carried out in the project documentation was in line with the project documentation and whether it could have caused the collapse.
  2. Set the cost of repairing the cable relay for the initial project and the project for which the restoration works were actually carried out.
  3. Install unused materials and equipment transferred to the contractor but not returned to the customer.
  4. Determine the volume and cost of the actual work done.
  5. Determine whether there are shortcomings in the original technical documentation and/or whether there have been changes affecting the duration of the work. If so, what period.

КЕЙС №4

Объект

Московский нефтеперерабатывающий завод Газпромнефть

Предмет экспертизы

Дороги и покрытия, технологические трубопроводы, эстакады трубопроводов, противопожарная и молниезащита, оборудование электроснабжения.

Место рассмотрения и защиты заключения

Арбитражный суд Тюменской области

Стоимость спора

9 304 932 527 руб. 40 коп.

Московский нефтеперерабатывающий завод Газпромнефть Московский нефтеперерабатывающий завод Газпромнефть

Вопросы, которые стояли перед экспертом

  1. Определить размер убытков из-за с устранением дефектов выполненных работ.
  2. Определить размер убытков из-за отказа подрядчика от исполнения договоров.
  3. Определить затраты генерального подрядчика на монтаж и аренду лесов.
  4. Определить стоимость фактически невыполненных работ.
  5. Определить объем и стоимость неизрасходованных материалов.
  6. Определить затраты на разработку исполнительной документации.

Case 5

Polyanka 44 Residential complex

The examination was considered in the Arbitration Court of Moscow

Место рассмотрения и защиты заключения

The examination was considered in the Arbitration Court of Moscow

The dispute cost

555,949,409 rubles. 31 cops..

The questions posed to the expert:

  1. Determine the conformity of the terms of the subcontract of the volumes, cost and duration of the work performed at the facility.
  2. Determine the amount of material resources costs directed to the subcontract works carried out.
  3. Is there any shortcomings in the work done? If so, determine the cost of eliminating them.
Fill out the form below to get advice
Fill out the form below
and we'll call you back

By filling out this form, you give your consent to the processing of your personal data (article 9 of Federal Law No. 152-FZ dated 27 July 2006 "On Personal Data").
Ваша заявка принята
Мы свяжемся с вами в ближайшее время.
Ваша заявка принята
Мы свяжемся с вами в ближайшее время.
Ваша заявка принята
Fill out the form below to get advice
By filling out this form, you give your consent to the processing of your personal data (article 9 of Federal Law No. 152-FZ dated 27 July 2006 "On Personal Data").